welcome
. . . to the weblog of
jon p. amos, hollie's
husband & dad of
ethan, levi, finn,
ellie, marley,
& sullivan

My Photo

my complete profile
theology pintnight
hollie's xanga
kids' photos
facebook
linkedin
wishlist

 
blog roll
formerly powered by
blogrolling.com
(r.i.p.)

useful
dictionary.com
bible gateway
daily office
textweek
imdb

 
archives
Dreams
Anglican?
Presbyterian?
Seminary, etc
Why "A minor"?
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
October 2008
November 2008
January 2009
July 2009
August 2009
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
Current


A minor

 

Wednesday, November 20, 2002


 
Bledsoe on Stories: Ideologies, Myths, and the Gospel

I recently read something about the growing dominance of individuals' seemingly insignificant stories (e.g. memoirs, autobiographies, journals - a genre that obviously includes blogs) over and above the older, more grand, daimon-filled stories (e.g. pagan myths and ancient epics). This is indeed a noticeable trend, as evidenced by the fact that university creative writing programs have more and more students working in the memoir genre. Anyway, the piece I read was arguing that this phenomenon can actually be seen as a veiled indicator of the gospel's triumph in history. Or at least I thought I read something along those lines...

Turns out, I was thinking of an email from Rich Bledsoe on the BH list. His post actually mentioned the stories of large ideologies or religions rather than the stories of the pagan myths or modern memoirs, although I think his points can be applied to both. Here's the bulk of his post:

One of [Eugen] Rosenstock-Huessy's contentions is that the next thousand years will be a time of "regrafting the dead branches of humanity back into the Tree of Life." ERH has proven to be remarkably insightful so far, and I hope his prophetic mantel continues to bear fruit. I take him to mean Europe, and even more radically, the Middle East.

In terms of Europe, can "the last man" really be "the last man"? Did not Christ die to redeem him as well? The "last man" is a prodigal son who is still in the pigpen, and to date has determined to remain there.

Half of Christ's program has thus far been completed. Nature is dead. The "last man" is the man who has thoroughly seen through nature, but has not yet gone on to be reconstituted by super nature. Islam is simply a violent attempt to return to blood and clan. It is thoroughly reactionary, and I think now spent. Whatever violent convulsions are still in it, it is incapable of creating any kind of future at all.

I struggle with all these issues partly because of where I live. My town is almost nothing but a populace of prodigals wallowing in the swill. I wake up every day trying to find some way to help some to find their way home.

Here is where I see it at this point. Jesus said that if anyone wanted to follow him, he must "hate his father and mother, and follow him." When St. Francis walked naked away from his father in the 13th century, it was still a revolutionary act. But no longer. By the late 20th century and early 21st century, everybody hates their father and mother. It is no longer revolutionary, or even interesting. Blood ties are no longer adequate to define us. The only real way forward is through working out the meaning of baptism. Since this isn't done, the alternatives are, a) reactionary and dead Islam, b) thoroughgoing neurosis - that is, being very unhappy at the fact that blood does not satisfy, and spending most of my life carping about parents, etc., to some psychotherapist trying to make it pan out, when it never can, or c) Buddhism or eastern mysticism which tells me that all the old natural bonds were illusory in the first place. The other older options of large public ideologies (like Marxism or fascism) appear to be dead or at least non-functional at the moment. Hence, our mythologies are pretty limited and uninteresting. We are mostly reduced to family myths. The older larger ones were more interesting (i.e. communism or nationalism, or some other -ism). Now it's only my father's or big brother's or mother's fault instead of the Jews or the capitalists. Pretty boring. But also, perhaps a victory for Christ. Christ appears to have reduced all the large myths to nothing. Now, the only really interesting direction to turn is to Him [to] spiritualize and supernaturalize the old bonds of nature. Nietzsche foresaw how boring it was all going to become. Jesus is really the only exciting thing left.
- Rich Bledsoe, pastor of Tree of Life (PCA), Boulder, CO, from an email dated 14 Nov 2002. Emphasis mine. Posted here by permission.

jon :: link :: comment ::


 
This page is powered by Blogger.
Site Meter