. . . to the weblog of
jon p. amos, hollie's
husband & dad of
ethan, levi, finn,
ellie, marley,
& sullivan

My Photo

my complete profile
theology pintnight
hollie's xanga
kids' photos

blog roll
formerly powered by

bible gateway
daily office

Seminary, etc
Why "A minor"?
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
October 2008
November 2008
January 2009
July 2009
August 2009
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011

A minor


Tuesday, January 17, 2006

A Sociology of Betrayed Trust in Outline
When a leader betrays his people's trust, they respond in various ways:

  1. One group responds by feeling the betrayal acutely and painfully. They love their leader and grieve that he betrayed them.

    1. Within this group, there is a subgroup of those who in their anguish feel as though they can't help but tell others about the situation. They cannot contain their grief, and they want to warn others, so they cry out from the highest places. If they're not careful, though, they become angry, embittered and unstable as they do so.

    2. Another subgroup for the most part grieves quietly. They can relate to Group IA, but they still have some hope that their leader will confess and make amends, and in the meantime they don't want to make matters worse.

  2. Another whole group responds by suppressing the knowledge of the betrayal altogether. Like Group I, they love their leader, but in such a way that their world would fall apart if he betrayed their trust. So they pretend nothing ever happened, which affects their old relationships in various ways:

    1. Group II and Group IA threathen one another's tender existences, so the two find themselves at odds with one another. Since Group II is loyal to the point of living in denial and self-deception, they see Group IA as unloyal and as the ones who have actually betrayed their and their leader's trust.

    2. Group II and Group IB continue to get along together, but there is a loss of connection between them - a loss of fellowship, community, and friendships - as they can no longer fully relate to one another. Group IB does not want to shatter Group II's glittering illusion, so Group IB keeps quiet. But get-togethers and quiet people who keep their grief to themselves don't mix well.

  3. A third group asks their leader where to sign up for his new enterprise. They follow him cultishly, idolatrously, to the death, not so much out of trust and love as out of covetousness, greed and envy - out of a desire to live vicariously, like groupies. So if their leader betrayed the trust of his people, they'll betray the trust of their friends. While Group II makes up the majority of the leader's followers, Group III makes up the majority of his inner circle of associates and assistants. However, in his heart of hearts, he doesn't trust either group as much as Group I; those people were (and are) his truest friends.
I'm not sure about all of this, but aspects of it seem to show up in all areas of society, from the business and political worlds to fraternal organizations, the church, etc.

jon :: link :: comment ::

This page is powered by Blogger.
Site Meter